DISPLAY COPY - FORM NOT LINKED TO CGI SCRIPT
Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College

Student Evaluation of Faculty (MSVCC Courses)
INSTRUCTIONS: Your evaluation of instruction is an important part of MGCCC's ongoing efforts to improve instruction in its online classes. Your sincere and thoughtful responses to the following statements about your instructor help the college improve quality. Your responses to this evaluation will be presented to the instructor and supervisory administrators in a format that is not personally identifiable.

When you have finished the evaluation, click the "Submit Evaluation" button at the bottom of this page. To clear your answers and start over, click the "Reset This Form" button.
 
COURSE CONTENT Strongly
Agree		 Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree		 No basis
for
judgment
1. Course objectives were clearly stated.
2. The content of the course was appropriate to the aims and objectives of the course.
3. The instructor's course objectives were logical and well-organized.
4. The instructor clarified complex course material.
5. The instructor adapted the course objectives to a reasonable level of comprehension.
6. The instructor used available technology (discussion board, e-mail, virtual classroom, etc.) appropriately to clarify course objectives.
7. The instructor used his/her knowledge to broaden my understanding of course objectives.
8. The instructor encouraged students' critical/independent thinking.
INSTRUCTIONAL METHODOLOGY Strongly
Agree		 Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree		 No basis
for
judgment
9. The instructor's methods of teaching were effective.
10. Student responsibilities were well-defined.
11. The instructor was concerned with whether or not students learned course content.
12. The instructor dealt fairly and impartially with students.
13. The instructor's methods of evaluation were fair.
14. The instructor responded to learner needs in a reasonable amount of time.
15. The instructor returned assignments promptly.
16. The instructor carefully answered questions raised by students.
17. The instructor treated students with respect.
18.  What specifically could be done to improve this course?
   
©2001, Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College